CSR Data
Environment
* Figures are non-consolidated basis. Base units are calculated according to non-consolidated sales amount in each business year.
* Environmental accounting information was added and the graphs of CO2 emissions quantity and basic unit were updated in September 2019.
Environmental Accounting
In order to promote the initiative on environmental conservation efficiently and effectively, we measure the costs and effects of overall environmental activities as quantitatively as possible, and strive to continuously improve environmental performance.
Environmental Conservation Cost (Unit: million yen)
Category | Major activities | Investment in FY2019 | Expense in FY2019 | Investment in FY2020 | Expense in FY2020 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Cost in business area | Pollution prevention cost : maintenance and management of pollution prevention equipment, and expenses for measurement/analysis Global environmental conservation cost : Introduction and maintenance of energy efficient and renewable energy equipment, recovery of fluorocarbons, and inspection Resource circulation cost : Recycling of waste, and subcontracting of waste disposal |
117 | 65 | 36 | 79 | |
2. Upstream / downstream cost | Difference by green purchasing, and product recycling and collection | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
3. Management activities | EMS operation maintenance and education, greening associated with business activities | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
4. Research and development cost | Development and production of environmentally-friendly products | 0 | 72 | 0 | 225 | |
5. Social activities cost | Provision of personnel and monetary aid to environment-related organizations, and external cleaning/greening activities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
6. Environmental damage cost | Purification and recovery of harmful substances leakage and polluted groundwater | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 131 | 139 | 37 | 307 |
Environmental Conservation Effects
*▲ indicates that it has increased compared to the previous year.*Water resources input includes water supply, groundwater and industrial water.
Category | Environmental performance indicators | FY2019 | FY2020 | Reduction effect |
---|---|---|---|---|
(1) Environmental conservation effects of the resources used for business activities | Total energy input (GJ) | 120,004 | 111,267 | 8,737 |
Water resources input (m3) | 27,556 | 26,586 | 970 | |
(2)Environmental conservation effects against environmental impacts and waste resulting from business activities | Greenhouse gas emissions (t-CO2) | 5,151 | 4,207 | 944 |
Total waste emissions (t) | 226 | 303 | ▲77 | |
Economic Effects of Environmental Conservation Measures (million yen)
FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Reduction in expense | 5 | 3 | |
Profit (recycling, etc.) | 23 | 4 | |
Total | 28 | 7 |
Calculation method
Environmental conservation costs and effects are calculated in accordance with the Environmental Accounting Guidelines (2005 version). An in-house “Environmental Accounting Procedure Manual” was created based on the guidelines. The effects of environmental conservation measures are calculated by comparing the adjusted sales to the previous fiscal year based on the procedure manual.
Electric Power
Public water supply
Paper
CO2
General Wastes
Industrial Wastes
Recycling
Social
Human Resources
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of employees (consolidated) |
Overall | 3,873 | 3,654 | 3,683 |
Number of employees (non-consolidated) | Male | 688 | 678 | 694 |
Female | 115 | 121 | 149 | |
Overall | 803 | 799 | 843 | |
Number of employees by age group(non-consolidated) | Less than 30 | 128 | 131 | 142 |
30~39 | 157 | 158 | 181 | |
40~49 | 230 | 224 | 225 | |
50~59 | 286 | 284 | 293 | |
60 or over | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Average age (non-consolidated) | Male | 44.2 | 44.1 | 44.2 |
Female | 38.8 | 38.7 | 38.5 | |
Overall | 43.4 | 43.3 | 43.2 | |
Average years of service (non-consolidated) |
Male | 18.1 | 18.2 | 17.9 |
Female | 13.3 | 12.9 | 12.0 | |
Overall | 17.5 | 17.4 | 16.8 |
Managerial Personnel
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of managerial personnel (non-consolidated) |
Male | 186 | 189 | 181 |
Female | 6 | 8 | 7 | |
Overall | 192 | 197 | 188 | |
Ratio of female managerial personnel (non-consolidated) | 3.13% | 4.06% | 3.72% | |
Department managers or higher (non-consolidated) |
Male | 45 | 46 | 28 |
Female | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Overall | 46 | 47 | 30 | |
Ratio of female department managers or higher (non-consolidated) | 2.17% | 2.13% | 6.67% |
Re-employment ratio
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Re-employment rate among mandatory retirees(non-consolidated) | 90.0% | 88.2% | 58.8% |
Employment of Disabled Persons
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of employed disabled persons (non-consolidated) | 24 | 24 | 28 | |
Ratio of employed disabled persons (non-consolidated) | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of employed disabled persons (consolidated) | 36 | 35 | 48 | |
Ratio of employed disabled persons (consolidated) | 2.92% | 2.52% | 2.89% |
Retention rate of newly graduated recruits
Retention rate (non-consolidated) | Number of new recruits in April 2018 | Number of those recruits as of April 2021 | |
---|---|---|---|
81.5% | 27 | 22 |
Recruitment Record
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Recruitment of new graduates (non-consolidated) |
Male | 12 | 19 | 14 |
Female | 10 | 8 | 6 | |
Overall | 22 | 27 | 20 | |
Recruitment of mid-career workers (non-consolidated) |
Male | 7 | 8 | 33 |
Female | 4 | 3 | 15 | |
Overall | 11 | 11 | 48 |
Life-Work Balance
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of employees taking childcare leave (non-consolidated) |
Male | 7 | 14 | 12 |
Female | 8 | 2 | 12 | |
Overall | 15 | 16 | 24 | |
Ratio of workers returning to work after childcare leave (non-consolidated) |
Overall | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Number of employees taking family nursing leave (non-consolidated) |
Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Female | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Overall | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Number of days of annual paid leave taken (non-consolidated) |
Overall | 14.7 | 13.6 | 15.7 |
Ratio of annual paid leave taken (non-consolidated) |
Overall | 74.7% | 69.0% | 82.4% |
Governance
Directors
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of directors (non-consolidated) |
Inside | 3 | 3 | 4 |
Outside | 4 | 7 | 5 | |
Number of female directors (non-consolidated) |
Inside | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Outside | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Ratio of outside directors (non-consolidated) |
57% | 70% | 56% | |
Ratio of female directors (non-consolidated) |
14% | 10% | 11% | |
Number of auditors (non-consolidated) |
Inside | 1 | - | - |
Outside | 3 | - | - |
Board of Directors
FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of meetings | 7 | 7 | 6 | |
Average attendance rate of directors | 98% | 100% | 100% |
Stock Information
Click here for stock information such as total number of shares, number of shareholders, and rating information.
Safety
Frequency of labor accidents
FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ratio of labor accidents (Number of accident victims taking leave / Total working hours) |
0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Number of qualified Safety Assessors
Qualified persons 565(as of April 2021)
Number of qualified Robot Safety Assessors
Qualified persons 122(as of April 2021)
Number of persons attending safety seminars
Aggregate number of attendees 40,099(as of FY2020)
Quality
Quality Education
Number of persons attending seven quality control training courses in FY2020 151(Employees and junior employees registered in IDEC and subsidiaries)
Quality control examination (QC examination)
Number of persons holding quality control examination (QC examination) grades 674(Employees and junior employees registered in IDEC and subsidiaries as of April 2021)
|
Grade 1 | Associate Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of holders | 1 | 7 | 64 | 426 | 148 | 646 |